| Organization Type |
https://ontology.global.church/core#OrganizationTypeScheme |
10 |
Classification of organizations by structural/governance form. Org types describe what an organization IS (Church, Agency, Network), not what it DOES — activity classification uses gc:EngagementAcceleratorScheme via gc:hasEngagementAccelerator. |
| Belief Type (may be superseded by HIS ROR) |
https://ontology.global.church/core#BeliefTypeScheme |
10 |
Classification of organizations by Christian tradition, aligned with the World Christian Database (WCD) six-megabloc taxonomy. Layer 2 in the three-layer religion classification: HIS ROR (religion) → BeliefType (Christian tradition) → Denomination. |
| Denomination |
https://ontology.global.church/core#DenominationScheme |
32 |
Classification of organizations by denomination. Two-level hierarchy with denomination families and specific bodies. Layer 3 in the three-layer religion classification: HIS ROR (religion) → BeliefType (Christian tradition) → Denomination. Informed by the World Christian Database (WCD) denomination taxonomy. |
| Engagement Accelerators |
https://ontology.global.church/core#EngagementAcceleratorScheme |
61 |
Twelve strategic domains that catalyze phase transitions among people groups, as defined by the Phases of Engagement Toolkit (April 2026). Each accelerator represents a dimension of gospel-oriented activity whose priority varies by engagement phase. |
| Engagement Strength |
https://ontology.global.church/core#EngagementStrengthScheme |
5 |
Five-level scale measuring the intensity and quality of gospel-oriented activity relative to the population at a given engagement phase. Strength is not a measurement of a team's quality or impact, but an indicator of gospel-oriented activity relative to the population. From the Phases of Engagement Toolkit (April 2026) by Frontiers, IMB, Joshua Project, Engage Network, Vision 5:9, and Accelerate. |
| Priority Levels |
https://ontology.global.church/core#PriorityLevelScheme |
5 |
Five-level priority scale for accelerator phase profiles. Indicates how much investment an engagement accelerator warrants at a specific phase of engagement. |
| Claim Status |
https://ontology.global.church/core#ClaimStatusScheme |
4 |
Status values for self-reported engagement claims. Tracks whether the claimed engagement is currently active, temporarily paused, completed, or withdrawn. |
| Assessment Methodology Scheme |
https://ontology.global.church/core#AssessmentMethodologyScheme |
3 |
Identifies the framework or scale used for an assessment. Each concept represents a distinct assessment methodology owned by a specific organization. |
| Endorsement Status Scheme |
https://ontology.global.church/core#EndorsementStatusScheme |
4 |
SKOS concept scheme for endorsement status values. |
| Endorsement Type Scheme |
https://ontology.global.church/core#EndorsementTypeScheme |
4 |
SKOS concept scheme for endorsement types. |
| Practice Type Scheme |
https://ontology.global.church/core#PracticeTypeScheme |
9 |
SKOS concept scheme containing the recognized practice types. |
| Resource Domain Scheme |
https://ontology.global.church/core#ResourceDomainScheme |
23 |
Content domain classification for ministry resources. Hierarchical — top concepts are broad domains, narrower concepts are specializations. |
| Resource Format Scheme |
https://ontology.global.church/core#ResourceFormatScheme |
8 |
SKOS concept scheme for resource delivery formats. |
| Resource Function Scheme |
https://ontology.global.church/core#ResourceFunctionScheme |
8 |
How the resource is used — its pedagogical or ministry function. |
| Resource Status Scheme |
https://ontology.global.church/core#ResourceStatusScheme |
5 |
SKOS concept scheme for resource lifecycle stages. Progression: NotStarted → Planned → InProgress → InReview → Available. |
| Theological Discipline Scheme |
https://ontology.global.church/core#TheologicalDisciplineScheme |
22 |
The classical divisions of theological study. Used to classify theological education resources by academic discipline. |